<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What I Think &#187; vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/tag/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink</link>
	<description>Yes. I&#039;m back.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Speech Recognition Made Easy With Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2008/11/21/speech-recognition-made-easy-with-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2008/11/21/speech-recognition-made-easy-with-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have no more to add:



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
I have no more to add:
</p>
<p>
<!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="373" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/KyLqUf4cdwc&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=5d1719&amp;color2=cd311b&amp;border=1&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KyLqUf4cdwc&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=5d1719&amp;color2=cd311b&amp;border=1&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/KyLqUf4cdwc/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2008/11/21/speech-recognition-made-easy-with-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Driver Flaw Exposes Vista Kernel to Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/08/11/ati-driver-flaw-exposes-vista-kernel-to-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/08/11/ati-driver-flaw-exposes-vista-kernel-to-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver_signing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/08/11/ati-driver-flaw-exposes-vista-kernel-to-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Security researchers have discovered a flaw with an ATI driver that allows unsigned and potentially dangerous code to be installed and loaded into the Vista kernel.


In order to increase security and to protect against attack, Microsoft have introduced a new driver signing requirement in Vista. By requiring that drivers are signed, Microsoft hoped that this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Security researchers have discovered a <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/10/ati_driver_snafu/">flaw with an ATI driver that allows unsigned and potentially dangerous code to be installed and loaded into the Vista kernel</a>.
</p>
<p>
In order to increase security and to protect against attack, Microsoft have introduced a new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_signing">driver signing</a> requirement in Vista. By requiring that drivers are signed, Microsoft hoped that this would ensure that only drivers which were verified as being clean and compatible with Vista could be installed.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://ati.amd.com/">ATI</a> duly had their drivers signed by <a href="http://www.verisign.com/">VeriSign</a> so that they could be installed on a Windows Vista system. Unfortunately, their was a flaw in one of the drivers. Apparently the flaw was originally intended as a shortcut in the driver that allowed ATI developers to load modules into the driver for testing. When the driver was released, either no-one thought to remove the shortcut or ATI forgot about it.
</p>
<p>
In order to close the hole, ATI will have to patch the flaw in their driver, have it signed with a new certificate, roll-out the update via Windows Update, then have the original signing authority revoke the original certificate. It&#8217;s not a straightforward process and it&#8217;s by no means foolproof either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/08/11/ati-driver-flaw-exposes-vista-kernel-to-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Names Matter on Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/23/program-names-matter-on-windows-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/23/program-names-matter-on-windows-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/23/program-names-matter-on-windows-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the selling points of Windows Vista is it&#8217;s increased security. User Account Control, (UAC), is designed to ensure that unknown programs aren&#8217;t launched without the users express permission. The idea is sound, but the actual implementation may be off.


The Register reports that the name of the program has a major bearing on whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
One of the selling points of Windows Vista is it&#8217;s increased security. User Account Control, (UAC), is designed to ensure that unknown programs aren&#8217;t launched without the users express permission. The idea is sound, but the actual implementation may be off.
</p>
<p>
The Register reports that the <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/23/vista_program_naming_oddness/">name of the program</a> has a major bearing on whether or not UAC asks the user to authenticate the installation. If the program is named &#8220;install.exe&#8221; for example, then Vista will require that the program have admin rights and UAC will prompt the user to cancel or allow installation. However, if the program name does not contain any references to &#8220;install&#8221;, &#8220;update&#8221; or &#8220;uninstall&#8221; then Vista will happily let it run without user intervention, even though it is the exact same program.
</p>
<p>
Microsoft responded that Vista was designed to automatically detect install, update and uninstall programs. As these types of programs generally need to write to protected areas of the registry and system files, then Vista would prompt for admin rights to be assigned to the program.
</p>
<p>
While Vista may have been designed to detect these type of programs, it seems that all it is doing is checking the program name, otherwise renaming the program would not allow the program to run without UAC prompting the user. While this type of behaviour may offer a modicum of protection, it can be sidestepped by using an innocuous file name. The big question now is how long will it take for malware authors to use this to bypass UAC and get their programs on to a Vista machine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/23/program-names-matter-on-windows-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>244 Copies of Vista Sold in China</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/18/244-copies-of-vista-sold-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/18/244-copies-of-vista-sold-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/18/244-copies-of-vista-sold-in-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The chief distributor of Windows Vista in Beijing has sold exactly 244 copies of Vista in 2 weeks in China. That&#8217;s right, 244 copies for a country of approximately 1.3 billion people. With any bit of luck, they may have sold 300 by the end of the week.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
The chief distributor of Windows Vista in Beijing has <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/18/1512216">sold exactly 244 copies of Vista</a> in 2 weeks in China. That&#8217;s right, 244 copies for a country of approximately 1.3 billion people. With any bit of luck, they may have sold 300 by the end of the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/18/244-copies-of-vista-sold-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Sounds Death Knell for XP</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/14/microsoft-sounds-death-knell-for-xp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/14/microsoft-sounds-death-knell-for-xp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/14/microsoft-sounds-death-knell-for-xp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Windows Vista has been released, (finally), and now it&#8217;s time to start saying goodbye to XP. Microsoft are to stop selling new licenses to OEM&#8217;s from the end of January 2008. This means that if you&#8217;re planning to buy a new computer in the next year from the likes of Dell, HP, Packard Bell et [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Windows Vista has been released, (finally), and now it&#8217;s time to start saying goodbye to XP. Microsoft are to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6551429.stm">stop selling new licenses to OEM&#8217;s</a> from the end of January 2008. This means that if you&#8217;re planning to buy a new computer in the next year from the likes of Dell, HP, Packard Bell et al, then you&#8217;ll have no option but to get it with Vista pre-installed.
</p>
<p>
While it may not seem like a big deal, a recent survey found that less than 10 percent of computer users who had even heard of Vista were planning to upgrade to the new OS. Most users are happy with their computer, it does what they want, and it does it well enough that they don&#8217;t see the need to change. Microsoft&#8217;s biggest competitor to Vista may just be XP.
</p>
<p>
I tried one of the beta releases of Vista, and to be honest, I wasn&#8217;t all that impressed. Yes it&#8217;s shiny, and yes it&#8217;s designed to be more secure out of the box, but is it worth the change? Not when you consider the lack of drivers, problems that existing programs are having with Vista, and the hardware needed to run it. I got rid of my copy of Vista, and went back to XP. I may try it again after the first Service pack has been released.
</p>
<p>
Once Windows XP is no longer available from the OEM&#8217;s, then the hardware manufacturers will have no option but to improve their drivers and the software developers will have to work on full Vista compatibility.
</p>
<p>
While XP may no longer be available to buy on a new computer, it will be fully <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3221">supported my Microsoft</a> until April 2009, with security updates available until April 2014. So there&#8217;s no need to worry just yet.
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/04/14/microsoft-sounds-death-knell-for-xp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Problems Start to Surface</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/03/27/vista-problems-start-to-surface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/03/27/vista-problems-start-to-surface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copy_bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/03/27/vista-problems-start-to-surface/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Vista has ben out for a couple of months now, and the problems are starting to mount. The latest issue is a problem with file copying. Quite a few users have reported that they experienced problems with the length of time taken for Vista to complete the deletion of of a file. Microsoft has a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Vista has ben out for a couple of months now, and the problems are starting to mount. The latest issue is a problem with <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/26/vista_copying_bug/">file copying</a>. Quite a few users have <a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1358057&#038;SiteID=17">reported</a> that they experienced problems with the length of time taken for Vista to complete the deletion of of a file. Microsoft has a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931770/en-us">hotfix</a> for the issue, but to get it you need to contact Microsoft Support and ask for it.
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s for reasons such as these, that upgrading to Vista should be left until after <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+already+planning+Vista+service+pack/2100-1016_3-6152704.html">Vista Service Pack 1 is released</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/03/27/vista-problems-start-to-surface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista is Released</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/02/05/windows-vista-is-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/02/05/windows-vista-is-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whatithink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/02/05/windows-vista-is-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system Windows Vista was released to the general public during the week, and already a security issue has been discovered. I wouldn&#8217;t call it a remote exploit as such, more of a &#8220;that might be funny to mess around with&#8221; kind of issue.


Still it doesn&#8217;t surprise me. Vista was released to businesses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft&#8217;s</a> new operating system <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/">Windows Vista</a> was released to the general public during the week, and already a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=416">security issue</a> has been discovered. I wouldn&#8217;t call it a remote exploit as such, more of a &#8220;that might be funny to mess around with&#8221; kind of issue.
</p>
<p>
Still it doesn&#8217;t surprise me. Vista was released to businesses a couple of months ago, and release candidates have been available to beta testers for several months before that, so the people who are interested in finding flaws have had plenty of time to do so.
</p>
<p>
Even though Vista was released a couple of years later than originally envisaged by Microsoft, and even though it is the latest and greatest home OS available, I won&#8217;t be rushing out to get it. Like any new product, it&#8217;s better to wait a while until the major bugs are found, patches released and rolled into a service pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmc.org/whatithink/2007/02/05/windows-vista-is-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
